To be honest, you will edit the Discussion part of your manuscript numerous times. A general experimental design worksheet is available to help plan your experiments in the core courses.
Nevertheless, descriptive research such as identification of factors that predict clinically relevant outcomes may have implications for targeting clinical assessment or interventions concerning such outcomes Drotar, It is advisable to work on a manuscript regularly to avoid losing familiarity with the article.
For example, studies that develop a new measure or test an intervention have greater potential clinical application than a descriptive study that is not directly focused on a clinical application.
Always identify treatments by the variable or treatment name, NOT by an ambiguous, generic name or number e.
Notice how the substitution in red of treatment and control identifiers clarifies the passage both in the context of the paper, and if taken out of context. In contrast, this example strays writing a journal article discussion into interpretation by referring to optimality a conceptual model and tieing the observed result to that idea: Each paragraph should contain opinions in favour or against the topic discussed, critical evaluations, and learning points.
Looking for your next university role? Finally, it is also problematic to introduce new findings in the discussion that have not been described in the results. If applicable, authors may also wish to present counterarguments that temper the primary threats to validity they discuss.
In line with the opinions of the referees, the manuscript can be critically reviewed, and perfected. Generally, after completion of the study, it is very difficult to solve the problems which might be discerned during the writing process.
It is appropriate to report, parenthetically, the source vendor and catalog number for reagents used, e. In conclusion, academic writing is similar to other skills, and practice makes perfect. One of the important mistakes is refraining from critical review of the manuscript as a whole after completion of the writing process.
Remind us why we should be interested in this research project. Make sure to acknowledge any weaknesses in your conclusions and suggest room for further research concerning that aspect of your analysis.
Achievement of the shared duties within a predetermined time frame will sustain the motivation of the researchers, and prevent wearing out of updated data. You may want to identify certain types of equipment by vendor name and brand or category e.
How should the manuscript be written? During this procedure, inevitably some issues which concerns general concept of manuscript writing process are dealt with. However writing manuscripts is a challenging endeavour in that we physicians have a heavy workload, and English which is common language used for the dissemination of scientific knowledge is not our mother tongue.
Advanced Search Presenting Results Authors face the significant challenge of presenting their results in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology JPP completely, yet succinctly and writing a convincing discussion section that highlights the importance of their research.
Writing the Discussion Section The purpose of the discussion is to give readers specific guidance about what was accomplished in the study, the scientific significance, and what research needs to be done next. Are you writing for research assessment?Despite such idiosyncrasies, knowing a few things about the purposes and format of a journal article will help you get published.
You should understand the function of each section and write accordingly. Writing the Discussion Section The purpose of the discussion is to give readers specific guidance about what was accomplished in the study, the scientific significance, and what research needs to be done next.
Writing for an academic journal: 10 tips your journal article writing, but sometimes it may seem overheated, personalised or even vindictive. It may be easier to develop them in discussion. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Sauaia, A.
et al. "The Anatomy of an Article: The Discussion Section: "How Does the Article I Read Today Change What I Will Recommend to my Patients Tomorrow?” The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 74 (June ): ; Research Limitations & Future Research.
Most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title, Authors and Affiliation, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgments, and Literature Cited, which parallel the experimental process.
This is the system we will use. Now that we’ve addressed the more technical portions of your journal manuscript, let’s turn to the analytical segments of your research article. In this article, we’ll provide tips on how to write a strong Discussion section that best portrays the significance of your research contributions.Download