But the mother would never have to give the baby a blood transfusion, no matter what the circumstances were. Trying to teach children to be careful around cars, for example, is not an easy task. Whether, however, present legal treatment of genetic fathers, and similar future treatment of genetic mothers whose embryos are removed early is itself right is another issue, an issue I will discuss later with regard to rights, responsibilities, and emotions concerning child bearing and child rearing.
It would be foolish, for example, to play Russian roulette even if you use guns with only one bullet among them all, making the odds only 1 in that you will kill yourself.
So although they teach high school students these days how to put a condom on a banana, I doubt they teach them how to remove them once, or before, the banana becomes a prune.
This bill passed the House of Commons but was defeated by a tie vote in the Senate. Worst of all, it would condemn victims of apeand incest to carry and nurture the offspring of their rapist. I prefer to spell out the rationales in those cases, however, because I think they are important to understand in their own right, and because I think they also have consequences for other cases.
That is, I assume that without some strong argument to the contrary, the genetic mother or father will have no right to terminate the life of an abandoned fetus as long as there is a suitable recipient gestation mother available or as long as sufficient life-support systems are available.
I think such arguments perhaps can be given, but I cannot fully articulate them here.
Unmarried women are four to five times more likely to abort than married and the abortion rate has doubled for 18 and 19 year olds.
Innocent people have a right not to be punished just to serve as an example of what would happen to a person guilty of a particular kind of crime, regardless of how much better conditions would be if some innocent person was occasionally punished, or even executed, that way.
That is, I do not think it is right for a person to whom pregnancy is unacceptable to have intercourse without using some reasonably effective form of birth control simply with the idea that she or, if a male, his partner will get an abortion if pregnancy occurs.
About 40 percent of Americans believe that abortion should remain legal and 40 percent believe it should be banned except when the pregnancy threatens the life of the mother or is the result of rape or incest. The procedure is primarily done in the first 28 weeks of pregnancy.
Thirty-three year old Michelle Urbain of south Florida has had five abortions so far. The fact that abortion movies are physically nauseating does not show that abortion is wrong any more than nauseating childbirth films, eye surgery films, or any other sort of medical procedure films show those things to be wrong.
Determining who is irresponsible and who is not may be difficult in some cases, but not in all. There is medical neurological argument to the contrary, but that is perhaps questionable too. There are a number of things I would like to say first on this issue.
There would no longer be the question of termination of the fetal life. According to this argument, if it is not known for certain whether something such as the fetus has a right to life, then it is reckless, and morally wrong, to treat that thing as if it lacks a right to life for example by killing it.
Is a foetus part of the mother or a separate being? In this paper I also wish to point out the lack of merit, and sometimes even the total lack of relevance, of some of the more politically popular or well-publicized arguments on both sides of the abortion issue.
Again, nothing is meant to be hidden by my choice of words; I am only trying to stay as neutral in use of language as possible. If we stipulated that a four day old fetus was not yet alive or human, and that a five day old fetus was, it seems to me that the fact killing it on the fifth day would be called murder and killing it on the fourth day would not be called murder makes virtually no difference in the morality of the situation.
The fact an embryo may not know it is being terminated and may not feel any pain in being terminated is not alone justification or sufficient grounds for terminating its development; it is only grounds for making such terminations, when they are justified, less terrible and inhumane than they might be at some later time, whether natural or man-made.The Abortion Debate Purposes of this Paper The purposes of this paper are (1) to show the weaknesses, invalidity, and irrelevancy of those arguments which have such flaws -- on both sides of the abortion issue, and (2) to show what the more important, relevant, and valid issues are in deciding the rightness or wrongness of abortion.
Seeing the Complexity in Both Sides of the Abortion Debate Director Tracy Droz Tragos from "Abortion: Stories Women Tell" poses at the Tribeca Film Festival Getty Images Studio in New York City on April 18, Both sides of the argument are presented which aims to show a fair and balanced view of this debate.
Before we look at the arguments for and against abortion here is a brief introduction to the abortion debate.
The Abortion Debate Essay Examples. 4 total results. An Analysis of the Merits of the Pro-Choice Arguments in the Abortion Debate. 1, words.
2 pages. The Question of Whose Choice It Is to Terminate Life in the Abortion Debate. 1, words. 3 pages. Evaluating the Validity of Both Sides of the Abortion Debate. 1, words.
2 pages. The abortion fight, while never far from the political forefront, has seen renewed interest on both sides of the aisle since the election of Donald Trump, who endorses the pro-life view, and Mike Pence, a Christian conservative. Argumentative Essay on Abortion: Pros and Cons 02 Dec — Writing Tips Abortion is a controversial topic due to the fact that it touches sensitive issues within the realms of morality, philosophy and ethics.Download