The Puritans in those times were very strict in personal habits and morality; swearing, drunkenness and gambling would be punished. The most obvious case is Abigail, who uses the situation to accuse Elizabeth Proctor of witchcraft and have her sent to jail.
The play can be seen as a eneral statement on the effects that fear and fanaticism can have on human beings and how one person can cause such catastrophe. Playwright Arthur Miller During this time there were few in the press willing to stand up against McCarthy and the anti-Communist machine.
One of the social issues affecting the Salem community is gender inequality. The character of John Proctor can also be linked closely Arthur Miller himself, both individuals stood up for what they believed in and got punished for doing so.
Meanwhile, the protagonist, John Proctor, also seeks to keep his good name from being tarnished. Arthur Miller wrote the play because he was accused of being a communist; Miller attended meetings between communist writers. Various characters base their actions on the desire to protect their respective reputations.
This dichotomy functions as the underlying logic behind the witch trials. Because of the theocratic nature of the society, moral laws and state laws are one and the same: But others thrive on the hysteria as well: Many things in history can relate in different aspects.
Any citizen who questions their rulings or procedures is deemed an enemy of the court and arrested. With McCarthyism, it was the communists that were hunted. Hysteria Aurther millers the crucible issues of logic and enables people to believe that their neighbors, whom they have always considered upstanding people, are committing absurd and unbelievable crimes—communing with the devil, killing babies, and so on.
In an environment where reputation plays such an important role, the fear of guilt by association becomes particularly pernicious. The people really believed that Lucifer was roaming the streets of Salem seeking to destroy the town and seeking to destroy the institution of the church. Such hysteria may occur today, dealing with the issue on terrorism.
People were involved in persecution in both time framed. Looking at the two historical events, we can see that hysteria was ever-present at the times in which they occurred.
As in America in the s their assumption being that communists were out therein The Crucible the villagers of Salem believed that the devil was out there. In the end, hysteria can thrive only because people benefit from it. Despite the age of The Crucible there are many issues included in it that are still very relevant in the modern world to day.
Some had their passports taken away, while others were jailed for refusing to give the names of other communists.
Though eventually his accusations were proven to be untrue, and he was censured by the Senate for unbecoming conduct, his zealous campaigning ushered in one of the most repressive times in 20th-century American politics.
Intolerance The Crucible is set in a theocratic society, in which the church and the state are one, and the religion is a strict, austere form of Protestantism known as Puritanism. The events that led up to the Salem witch trails and McCarthyism was also similar. In many ways the assumption of devil activity seemed to be a way of finding a scapegoat for the personal problems of the community.
Focused on maintaining public reputation, the townsfolk of Salem must fear that the sins of their friends and associates will taint their names.
It is a purely a controversial play, so why write a play knowing the danger you were putting yourself in?
This play turned out to be one of the most relevant plays of the past and of today. Arthur Miller, Elia Kazan and the Blacklist: Corrupt citizens like Thomas Putnam also manipulate the court system by using the witch trials as a way to increase their wealth, while Reverend Parris uses the trials to ensure his position of authority in the community.
Both events were irrational fears that witchcraft and communism were going to change the face of society if drastic measures were not taken. Despite the evidence against Abigail and her followers, both court officials refuse to relinquish their authority and continue unjustly sentencing innocent citizens.
Ina man called Franco Zefferelli produced a film of the Shakespeare classic Essay Humans as a race do not seem to learn from their mistakes, for if they did, World War II would not have occurred.
The trials, which were well publicized, could often destroy a career with a single unsubstantiated accusation. Women, particularly young females, are marginalized in the highly patriarchal Puritan society. Both Giles Corey and John Proctor end up losing their lives because they refuse to capitulate with the court officials and attempt to expose its corrupt nature.Miller wrote "The Crucible" in about a year.
Plays by Miller and others had already been boycotted and banned by various organizations. The play opened on Broadway to unfavorable reviews, perhaps because of director Jed Harris's stoic interpretation.
Among those well-known artists accused of communist sympathies or called before the committee were Dashiell Hammett, Waldo Salt, Lillian Hellman, Lena Horne, Paul Robeson, Elia Kazan, Arthur Miller, Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, Charlie Chaplin and Group Theatre members Clifford Odets, Elia Kazan, and Stella Adler.
In all, three. The Crucible by Arthur Miller Essay Words | 10 Pages. The Crucible by Arthur Miller Arthur Miller was an American playwright who was born in He grew up in New York to a Jewish family. He graduated from the University of Michigan in where he began to distinguish himself as a playwright.
Essay about The Crucible by Arthur Miller.
The Crucible was based in in and around the town of Salem, Massachusetts, USA. The Salem witch-hunt was view as one of the strangest and most horrendous chapters in the human history. The issues of power, that Arthur Miller's The Crucible, portrays are concerned with, who has the power, the shifts of power that take place and how power can consume people and try to abuse it, for either vengeance, jealously, material gain or sexual desire.
There are a great many social issues in this play, and because the play is a metaphorical expression of McCarthyism, the social issues can be interpreted through the lens of two eras: the s, and the late seventeenth century.Download